Download Process Control At Polaroid Pdf 825

 

This list of film formats catalogues formats developed for shooting or viewing motion pictures, ranging from the Chronophotographe format from 1888, to mid-20th century formats such as the 1953 CinemaScope format, to more recent formats such as the 1992 IMAX HD format. To be included in this list, the formats must all have been used in the field or for test shooting, and they must all use photochemical images that are formed or projected on a film base, a transparent substrate which supports the photosensitive emulsion.

  1. Download Process Control At Polaroid Pdf 825 Pdf

As well, the formats must have been used to make more than just a few test frames. The camera must be fast enough (in frames per second) to create an illusion of motion consistent with the persistence of vision phenomenon. The format must be significantly unique from other listed formats in regard to its image capture or image projection. The format characteristics should be clearly definable in several listed parameters (e. g., film gauge, aspect ratio, etc.).

Legend[edit]

  • Format is the name of the process; some formats may have multiple names in common usage.
  • Creator is the individual or company most directly attributable as the developer of the system.
  • Year created usually refers to the earliest date that the system was used to completion (i.e. projection), but may refer to when it was developed if no known film was made.
  • First known film is the first film (not including tests) made with the format and intended for release.
  • Negative gauge is the film gauge (width) used for the original camera negative.
  • Negative aspect ratio is the image ratio determined by the ratio of the gate dimensions multiplied by the anamorphic power of the camera lenses (1x in the case of spherical lenses).[1]
  • Gate dimensions are the width and height of the camera gate aperture, and by extension the film negative frame.
  • Negative pulldown describes the film perforations per frame, the direction of film transport, and standard frame speed. Film transport is assumed to be vertical unless otherwise noted, and standard frame speed is assumed to be 24 frames per second unless the film is otherwise noted or has no standard. Silent film has no standard speed; many amateur formats have several common speeds, but no standard.
  • Negative lenses indicates whether spherical (normal) or anamorphic lenses are used on the original camera negative, and if anamorphic lenses, what anamorphic power is used.
  • Projection gauge is the film gauge (width) used for the release print.
  • Projection aspect ratio is the image ratio determined by the ratio of the projection dimensions multiplied by the anamorphic power of the projection lenses (1x in the case of spherical lenses). This is also known as the intended theatrical aspect ratio.[1]
  • Projection dimensions are the width and height of the projector aperture plate, and by extension the film frame area which is projected. The aperture plate always very slightly crops the frame.
  • Projection lenses indicates whether spherical (normal) or anamorphic lenses are used on the projector, and if anamorphic lenses, what anamorphic power is used.
Download Process Control At Polaroid Pdf 825

Formats are listed in chronological order and by release date in the case of multiple formats within one year, if this can be determined. Undated formats are listed at the bottom in alphabetical order.

Film formats[edit]

The philosophy of automation, monitoring process control system, safety instrumented system & hazard-monitoring system is prepared for RC-4 platform following facilities. Production Wells control through Wellhead Control Panel. View and Download Polaroid Digital Picture Frame user manual online. Polaroid PhotoMAX Digital Picture Frame User's Guide. Digital Picture Frame Digital Photo Frame pdf manual download. Also for: Photomax. Related Manuals for Polaroid Digital Picture Frame. In-process color balance adjustment of photographic film using filter dyes. Download PDF 3990898. Successful process control during the coating of a. Chemical Process Control George Stephanopoulos.pdf Free Download Here Chemical Process Control, 2001, George Stephanopoulos. 0 has improvements in Import from Polaroid Pdf 825. By Kathy Schwalbe Pdf Free Download your Polaroid Pdf 825 Manual without. Process control is the measurement of a process variable, the comparison of that variables with. Process control polaroid 1. Process control at Polaroid ChulanuntThaiyanunt Basing your analysis on both quantitative and qualitative tools, what evidence is there that quality is getting better? DATA Process Control at Polaroid Data from Exhibit 5 POD WEIGHT. Hubspot PATYA NANDA.pdf. Download the iOS. Process Control at Polaroid (B) Subscribe Sign In. SUGGESTED TOPICS. How to Download. A digital book provided in three formats (PDF, ePub, and Mobi) for the price of one.

The table does not cover 3-D film systems or color film systems, nor is it well-suited to emphasize the differences between those systems.
FormatCreatorEst.First
known work
Negative
gauge
Negative
A/R[1]
Gate
dims
Negative
pulldown
Negative
lenses
Projection
gauge
Projection
A/R[1]
Projection
dims
Projection
lenses
Chronophotographe[2]Étienne-Jules Marey1888motion analysis studies90 mm1.003.543' x 3.543'unperforatedspherical


Paper film[3]Louis Le Prince1888Roundhay Garden Scene65 mm1.00unperforatedsphericalnot known1.00spherical


Machine CameraWm. Friese-Greene1889Hyde Park Corner & Marble Arch65 mm1.00pin wheel perforationspherical


Kinetoscope cylinderWm. Dickson & T. Edison1889 or 1890Monkeyshines, No. 1strip rolled around a cylinderunperforatedsphericalspherical


KinesigraphWordsworth Donisthorpe1890 or 1891view of Trafalgar Square70 mm1.00unperforatedspherical


Friese-GreeneWm. Friese-Greene1891King's Road, Chelsea, London60 mm1.3258 round perfs, 2 sidesspherical


Kinetoscope horizontalWm. Dickson & William Heise1891Dickson Greeting19 mm6 perf, 1 side, horizontalsphericalspherical


Silent film standardWm. Dickson & T. Edison1892Blacksmith Scene35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.330.931' x 0.698'spherical


BioscopMax Skladanowsky1892footage of Emil Skladanowsky54 mmunperforated (camera); 4 perf, 2 sides (projection)spherical54 mm (two strips interleaved)spherical


Eidoloscope[4]Woodville Latham1895Griffo-Barnett Prize Fight51 mm1.851.457' x 0.787'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical51 mm1.85spherical


CinematographeLumière Brothers1895La Sortie des Usines Lumiere35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'1 perf, 2 sides (rounded)spherical35 mm1.33spherical


BiographHerman Casler1895Sparring Contest at Canastota68 mm1.352.625' x 1.938'1 perf, 2 sides (punched in-camera)spherical68 mmspherical


Joly-NormandinHenri Joly189560 mm5 perf, 2 sidesspherical60 mmspherical


BiographeDemeny-Gaumont189660 mm1.401.750' x. 1.250'unperforatedspherical60 mm1.40spherical


ChronophotographeDemeny-Gaumont189660 mm1.401.750' x. 1.250'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical60 mm1.40spherical


Sivan-DalphinCasimir Sivan and E. Dalphin189638 mm2 perf, 2 sidesspherical38 mmspherical


VeriscopeEnoch Rector1897The Corbett-Fitzsimmons Fight63 mm1.661.875' x 1.125'5 perf, 2 sidesspherical63 mmspherical


ViventoscopeThomas Henry Blair189748 mm1.501.500' x 1.000'1 perf?spherical48 mmspherical


BirtacBirt Acres1898unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm2 perf, 1 sidespherical17.5 mmspherical


BiokamT. C. Hepworth1899unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm1.600.630' x 0.394'1 perf, centerspherical17.5 mmspherical


Prestwich 13 mmJohn Alfred Prestwich1899unknown (amateur format)13 mmspherical13 mmspherical


MirographReulos, Goudeau & Co1900unknown (amateur format)21 mm1 notch, 2 sidesspherical21 mmspherical


Lumiere WideLumière Brothers190075 mm1.332.362' x 1.772'8 perf, 2 sidesspherical75 mm1.33spherical


CinéoramaR. Grimoin-Sanson1900Cinéorama70 mm x 10 cameras (360°)4 perf?spherical70 mm x 10 projectors (360°)spherical


La Petite (Hughes)W.C. Hughes1900unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm1.600.630' x 0.394'1 perf, center (smaller and less rectangular than Biokam)spherical17.5 mmspherical


Pocket ChronoGaumont Demeny1900unknown (amateur format)15 mm1 perf, centerspherical15 mmspherical


VitakWilliam Wardell1902unknown (amateur format)no standardno standardno standard1 perf, centerspherical11 mmspherical


Home KinetoscopeEdison1912unknown (amateur format)no standardno standardno standardno standardspherical22 mm, 2 perf (on frameline between frame rows)1.50.236' x 0.157' (three frames across width)spherical


Pathe KokPathé1912unknown (amateur format)28 mm1.360.748' x 0.551'3 perf on one side, 1 perf on the otherspherical28 mmspherical


DuoscopeAlexander F. Victor1912unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm2 perfs, centerspherical17.5 mmspherical


Panoramico[5]Filoteo Alberini1914Il sacco di Roma70 mm2.525 perf, 2 sidesspherical70 mmspherical


Split DuplexDuplex Corporation191535 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sides (shooting)spherical35 mm1.870.735' x 0.394'spherical (split image 90° rotated)


11 mm(American)1916unknown (amateur format)11 mm1 perf, centerspherical11 mmspherical


MovetteMovette Camera Company1917unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm2 perfs, 2 sides (rounded)spherical17.5 mmspherical


28 mm safety standardAlexander F. Victor1918unknown (amateur format)28 mm1.360.748' x 0.551'3 perf, 2 sidesspherical28 mmspherical


Clou(Austrian)1920unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm2 perf, 2 sidesspherical17.5 mmspherical


26 mm(French)1920unknown (amateur format)26 mm1 perf, 1 sidespherical26 mmspherical


9.5 mmPathé1922unknown (amateur format)9.5 mm1.310.335' x 0.256'1 perf, centerspherical9.5 mm1.310.315' x 0.242'spherical


PhonofilmLee De Forest1922Barking Dog and Flying Jenny Airplane35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.170.826' x 0.708'spherical


Widescope[6]John D. Elms & George W. Bingham192235 mm x 2 (both in same camera)0.980' x 0.735'1.33 x 2 negatives4 perf, 2 sidesspherical (one lens per strip)35 mm x 2 projectors2.660.931' x 0.698'spherical


CineblocOzaphan1922unknown (amateur format)22 mm2 perf, 2 sidesspherical22 mmspherical


Tri-Ergon soundfilm[6]Tri-Ergon192235 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical42 mm1.330.931' x 0.698'spherical


16 mm[7]Eastman Kodak1923unknown (amateur format)16 mm1.370.404' x 0.295'1 perf, 1 or 2 sidesspherical16 mm1.370.378' x 0.276'spherical


DuplexG.J. Bradley1923unknown (amateur format)11 mm2 perf, 2 sides (rounded)spherical11.5 mmspherical


Alberini-HillCorrado Cerqua192435 mm1.661.575' x 0.945' (curved)10 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical, on 65° revolving drum35 mmspherical


CineluxOzaphan1924unknown (amateur format)24 mmspherical24 mmspherical


48 mmJ.H. Powrie192448 mm1.321.969' x 1.496'horizontalspherical35 mm1.330.931' x 0.698'spherical


Natural Vision[8]George K. Spoor & P. John Berggren1925Niagara Falls and Rollercoaster Ride63.5 mm1.842.060' x 1.120'6 perf, 2 sides, 20 frame/sspherical63.5 mm2.00spherical


13 mm(French)1925unknown (amateur format)13 mm4 perf, centerspherical13 mmspherical


18 mm(Russian)1925unknown (amateur format)18 mm1 perf, 2 sidesspherical18 mmspherical


Pathe RuralPathé1926unknown (amateur format)17.5 mm1.35 (silent); 1.30 (sound)0.516' x 0.382' (silent); 0.445' x 0.343' (sound)1 perf, 2 sidesspherical17.5 mm1.33 (silent); 1.26 (sound)0.472' x 0.354' (silent); 0.445' x 0.343' (sound)spherical


Widevision[6]John D. Elms & George W. Bingham1926Natural Vision Pictures57 mm5 perf, 2 sidesspherical57 mmspherical


Magnascope[5]Lorenzo del Riccio1926Old Ironsides35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.330.931' x 0.698'spherical (selected scenes projected using a wider lens for larger picture)


F. H. Owens, T. Case, Tri-Ergon1927Sunrise35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.170.826' x 0.708'spherical


Polyvision[9]Abel Gance1927Napoléon35 mm x 3 cameras1.33 x 3 negatives0.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 3 projectors4.000.931' x 0.698'spherical


HypergonarHenri Chrétien1927Pour construire un feu35 mm2.660.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sides2x anamorphic35 mm2.660.931' x 0.698'2x anamorphic


Magnafilm[10]Lorenzo del Riccio1929You're in the Army Now56 mm2.191.620' x 0.740'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical56 mm2.00spherical


Fox Grandeur[10]Fox Film Corporation1929Fox Grandeur News and Fox Movietone Follies of 192970 mm2.071.890' x 0.913'4 perf, 2 sides, 20 frame/s (before 1930)spherical70 mm2.001.768' x 0.885'spherical


Fearless Super Pictures[11]Ralph G. Fear192935 mm2.271.813' x 0.800'10 perfs, 2 sides, horizontalspherical35 mm, horizontalspherical


Fearless Super-Film /
Magnifilm /
Fox Vitascope[12]
Ralph G. Fear1930Kismet65 mm2.001.811' x 0.906'5 perf, 2 sidesspherical65 mm2.051.772' x 0.866'spherical


Realife[11]MGM1930Billy the Kid70 mm2.071.890' x 0.913'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.750.904' x 0.517'spherical


50 mm[13]Fox Film Corporation & SMPE193050 mm1.801.325' x 0.735'spherical50 mm1.801.305' x 0.725'spherical


17 mm sound(French)1930unknown (amateur format)17 mm1 perf, 1 sidespherical17 mmspherical


Giant Expanding PicturesGeorge Palmer193035 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.170.826' x 0.708'spherical (with a special projection zoom lens zooming wider and opening masking for key sequences)


Kodel Kemco HomovieClarence Ogden1931unknown (amateur format)16 mm4 sequential images per frame1 perf, 2 sidesspherical16 mmspherical


Academy format[14]AMPAS193235 mm1.375 (commonly abbreviated to 1.37)0.868″ × 0.631″4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.370.825″ × 0.600″spherical


8 mmEastman Kodak1932unknown (amateur format)16 mm1.320.192' x 0.145'1 perf, 1 side (using 16 mm film with twice as many perfs)spherical8 mm1.330.172' x 0.129'spherical


Straight 8Bell & Howell1935unknown (amateur format)8 mm1.320.192' x 0.145'1 perf, 1 sidespherical8 mm1.330.172' x 0.129'spherical


VitaramaFred Waller193916 mm x 11 cameras1.37 x 11 negatives0.404' x 0.295'1 perf, 2 sidesspherical16 mm x 11 projectorshemispherical view0.378' x 0.276'spherical


Waller Flexible
Gunnery Trainer
Fred Waller1943US Air Force interactive training exercise35 mm x 5 cameras1.37 x 5 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 5 projectorshemispherical view0.825' x 0.602'spherical


Cinerama[15]Fred Waller1952This is Cinerama35 mm x 3 cameras2.59 (3 x negatives)0.996' x 1.116'6 perf, 2 sides at 26 frame/sspherical35 mm x 3 projectors, with 6 perf pulldown2.59, with 146° curved screen0.985' x 1.088'spherical


Matted 1.66[14]Paramount1953Shane35 mm1.370.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.660.825' x 0.497'spherical


Matted 1.85[14]Universal1953Thunder Bay35 mm1.370.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.850.825' x 0.446'spherical


Matted 1.75MGM1953Arena35 mm1.370.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm1.750.825' x 0.471'spherical


Cinemascope[16]20th Century Fox1953The Robe35 mm2.55 (1953–57); 2.35 (1957–67)0.937' x 0.735' (1953–57); 0.868' x 0.735' (1957–67)4 perf, 2 sides2x anamorphic35 mm2.55 (1953–57); 2.35 (1957–67)0.912' x 0.715' (1953–57); 0.839' x 0.715' (1957–67)2x anamorphic


Arnoldscope[17]John Arnold195335 mm10 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical


VistaVision[18]Paramount1954White Christmas35 mm1.511.495' x 0.991'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical35 mm, 4 perf, vertical1.850.825' x 0.446'spherical


VistaVision Large Area[18][19]Paramount1954White Christmas35 mm1.511.495' x 0.991'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical35 mm, 8 perf, horizontal1.961.418' x 0.723'spherical


And understandably, the sound is very retro for 1960-1961, comprised as the record is primarily of the rock & roll and hardcore rockabilly numbers that he cut for Sun in 1956 (with his original group ) and 1957, including the -authored 'You're My Baby,' the / collaboration 'Rock House,' and ' 'Mean Little Mama' and 'Problem Child.' Not everything is quite as briskly paced as those two numbers, but even the ballads, such as 'Sweet and Easy to Love' and 'Devil Doll,' and the melodic 'This Kind of Love' and 'It's Too Late,' have an edge to them -- they stand midway between the rock & roll that was happening in 1956 and the more lush and dramatic sound that would perfect at Monument Records from 1959 onward. Although it was technically 's first album, wasn't really an LP effort on his part so much as a cash-in effort by Sun Records in the wake of 's later success on Monument Records with 'Uptown,' 'Only the Lonely,' etc. Download roy orbison at the rock house rar software. All of the material is fascinating as a sort of alternate-universe version of where might've headed musically, and most of it is downright bracing and exciting, though it's easy to see why it never succeeded at the time -- numbers like 'You're Gonna Cry' and 'Problem Child' were a little too intense and ambitious as rock & roll, with too many changes and involved lyrics, to hold that audience en masse.

Superscope[20]Tushinsky Brothers1954Vera Cruz35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm2.000.715' x 0.715'2x anamorphic


Circarama[21]Disney1955A Tour of the West16 mm x 11 cameras1.37 x 11 negatives0.404' x 0.295'1 perf, 2 sidesspherical16 mm x 11 projectors360°0.378' x 0.276'spherical


Todd-AO[22][23]Michael Todd1955Oklahoma65 mm2.292.072' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, at 30 frame/sspherical70 mm2.21, with 120° curved screen1.912' x 0.870'spherical


CinemaScope 55[24]20th Century Fox1955Carousel55 mm2.551.824' x 1.430'8 perfs, 2 sides2x anamorphic35 mm2.550.912' x 0.715'2x anamorphic


9.5 Duplex[25]Pathé Fréres1955?9.5 mm1.514.1 mm x 6.2 mm2 central perforations in a 9.5mm filmspherical4.75 mmspherical, rotated 90°


8 mm Panoramic[26]Dimaphot, Paris1955?16 mm1.55 mm x 7.5 mm1 perf, 2 sidesspherical8 mmspherical, rotated 90°


Emel Panoscope[27]Emel, Paris1955?16 mm2.73.5 mm x 9.6 mm2 perf, 2 sidesspherical16 mmspherical


Technirama[28]Technicolor1956The Monte Carlo Story35 mm2.261.496' x 0.992'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontally1.5x anamorphic35 mm, 4 perf vertical2.350.839' x 0.715'2x anamorphic


Technirama Large Area[28]Technicolor1956The Monte Carlo Story35 mm2.261.496' x 0.992'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontally1.5x anamorphic35 mm, 8 perf horizontal2.421.421' x 0.881'1.5x anamorphic


Dynamic Frame[29]Glenn Alvey1956The Door in the Wall35 mm1.3, 1.6, and 2.5variable aperture plates8 perf, 2 sides, horizontallyspherical35 mm, 4 perf, vertical1.3, 1.5, and 2.5spherical


Superscope 235[20]Superscope Inc.1956Run for the Sun35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm2.350.839' x 0.715'2x anamorphic


Thrillarama[30]Albert H. Reynolds1956Thrillarama Adventure35 mm x 2 cameras1.78 x 2 negatives3 perf, 2 sides?spherical35 mm x 2 projectors3.55, with a curved screenspherical


Magirama[9]Abel Gance1956Magirama35 mm x 3 cameras (sides bounced off mirrors)1.33 x 3 negatives0.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 3 projectors (sides bounced off mirrors)4.000.931' x 0.698'spherical


MGM Camera 65Panavision1957Raintree County65 mm2.762.072' x 0.906'5 perf, 2 sides1.25x anamorphic70 mm2.761.912' x 0.870'1.25x anamorphic


Ultra Panavision[31]Panavision1962Mutiny on the Bounty65 mm2.762.072' x 0.906'5 perf, 2 sides1.25x anamorphic70 mm2.761.912' x 0.870'1.25x anamorphic


Cinestage[32]Mike Todd1957Around the World in 80 Days65 mm2.292.072' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sidesspherical35 mm (1 mm shaved off for UK prints)2.120.912' x 0.675'1.567x anamorphic


Rank VistaVisionJ. Arthur Rank Organization195735 mm1.511.495' x 0.991'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontallyspherical35 mm, 4 perf, vertical1.820.825' x 0.602'1.33x anamorphic


Modern anamorphic[33]Panavision1958The Female Animal35 mm2.370.866' x 0.732'4 perf, 2 sides2x anamorphic35 mm2.35 (1957–70); 2.39 (1970–present)0.839' x 0.715' (1957–70); 0.838' x 0.7' (1970–93); 0.825' x 0.690' (1993–present)2x anamorphic


Kinopanorama[34]NIKFI1958Great Is My Country35 mm x 3 cameras0.91 x 3 negatives1.014' x 1.116'6 perf, 2 sides, at 25 frame/sspherical35 mm x 3 projectors2.720.985' x 1.088'spherical


70 mm[22][35]American Optical Company1958South Pacific65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sidesspherical70 mm2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


Cinemiracle[36]National Theatres1958Windjammer35 mm x 3 cameras (sides bounced off mirrors)0.89 x 3 negatives0.996' x 1.116'6 perf, 2 sides at 26 frame/sspherical35 mm x 3 projectors (sides bounced off mirrors), with 6 perf pulldown2.59, with 120° curved screen0.985' x 1.088'spherical


Super Technirama[28]Technicolor1959Sleeping Beauty35 mm2.261.496' x 0.992'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontally1.5x anamorphic70 mm2.211.912' x 0.816'spherical


Smith-Carney System[37]Rowe E. Carney Jr. and Tom F. Smith1959Missouri travelogue35 mm4.690.839' x 0.370' (bottom half) and 0.449' x 0.370' (top quarters)4 perf, 2 sidesspherical x 335 mm4.69three sub-frames projected to one 180° imagespherical x 3


Computer organization design hardware software interface pdf download free download

Circular Kinopanorama / Circlorama[38]E. Goldovsky1959The Path of Spring35 mm x 11 cameras1.37 x 11 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 11 projectors360°0.825' x 0.602'spherical


Varioscope[39]Jan Jacobsen1959Flying Clipper65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sidesspherical70 mmvariable framing run through control signal1.912' x 0.87'spherical


Quadravision[40]Ford Motor Company1959Design for Suburban Living showtent? mm x 4 cameras? x 4 negativesspherical? mm x 4 projectors? (4 images in 2x2 configuration)spherical


Techniscope[41]Technicolor1960The Pharaoh's Woman35 mm2.330.868' x 0.373'2 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm2.390.838' x 0.7'2x anamorphic


Wonderama (Arc 120)[42]Leon W. Wells1960Honeymoonno standardno standardno standardno standardno standard35 mm2.50 with a 120° curved screen0.931' x 0.698', with two half-images turned 90° and placed side-by-sidespherical x 2


Cine System 3[43][44]Eric Berndt1960USAF and NASA usage3 mm1 perf, centeredspherical


Grandeur 70[45]20th Century Fox1961The King and I (re-release)55 mm2.551.824' x 1.430'8 perfs, 2 sides2x anamorphic70 mm2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


Cinerama 360[42]Cinerama Corporation1962Journey to the Stars65 mm1.00 (circle)2.25' diameter circular image10 perf, 2 sidesfisheye70 mm1.00 (circle)2.25' diameter circular imagespherical


Super 8Eastman Kodak1965unknown (amateur format)8 mm1.480.245' x 0.166'1 perf, 1 sidespherical8 mm1.360.215' x 0.158'spherical


Real Sound[citation needed]Kenner1965no standardno standardno standard1 perf, 1 sidespherical11.5 mm1.330.172' x 0.129'spherical


Double Super 8[citation needed]Eastman Kodak1965unknown (amateur format)16 mm1.480.245' x 0.166'1 perf, 1 side (using 16 mm film with twice as many perfs)spherical8 mm1.360.215' x 0.158'spherical


Single-8[46]Fujifilm1966unknown (amateur format)8 mm1.360.224' x 0.164'1 perf, 1 sidespherical8 mm1.350.213' x 0.157'spherical


Dimension 150[47]American Optical Company1966The Bible: In the Beginning65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sidesspherical70 mm2.21, with 150° curved screen1.912' x 0.87', optically curved to compensate for the screenspherical


Circle Vision 360[38]Disney1967America the Beautiful35 mm x 9 cameras1.37 x 9 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 9 projectors360°0.825' x 0.602'spherical


8.75 mm[48]Shanghai Film Projection Equipment Factory1968unknown (amateur format)1 perfspherical8.75 mmspherical


Astrovision[49]Goto Optical196965 mm10 perf, 2 sidesspherical or fish-eye70 mmfish-eye (dome projection)


IMAX[50]IMAX Corporation1970Tiger Child70 mm1.342.772' x 2.072'15 perf, 2 sides, horizontallyspherical70 mm, horizontal1.312.692' x 2.056'spherical


Super 16 mm film[7]Rune Ericson1970Blushing Charlie16 mm1.660.493' x 0.292'1 perf, 1 sidesphericalno standard, but often blown up to 35 mmno standard0.463' x 0.279' (full frame); 0.463' x 0.251' (framed for 1.85)spherical


Pik-a-Movie[51]Leon W. Wells1972no standardno standardno standardno standardno standard70 mm, horizontal, 1 perf, 2 sides1.480.245' x 0.166', 12 rows high, underneath 12 rows of optical soundspherical


OMNIMAX[52]IMAX Corporation1973Garden Isle70 mm1.342.772' x 2.072'15 perf, 2 sides, horizontallyspecial fish-eye lenses optically centered 0.37' above film horizontal center line70 mm, horizontal1.312.692' x 2.056'spherical, projected elliptically on a dome screen, 20 degrees below and 110 degrees above perfectly centered viewers


8/70 (Dynavision,
Iwerks 870)[53]
Dynavision1973?65 mm1.372.031' x 1.484'8 perf, 2 sides, 24 or 30 frame/sspherical70 mm1.341.913' x 1.431'spherical


Showscan[54]Douglas Trumbull1978Night of Dreams65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, at 60 frame/sspherical70 mm, at 60 frame/s2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


Polavision[55]Polaroid Corporation1978unknown (amateur format)8 mm1.480.245' x 0.166'1 perf, 1 sidespherical8 mm1.360.215' x 0.158'spherical


Cinema 180[56]Omni Films1979Crazy Wheels65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, 30 frame/sfisheye70 mm180°, on a dome1.912' x 0.87'fisheye


Super 35[57]Joe Dunton1982Dance Craze35 mm1.330.980' x 0.735'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mmno standardno standardno standard


Circle Vision 200[58]Disney1982Impressions de France35 mm x 5 cameras1.37 x 5 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 5 projectors6.85, on a 200° screen0.825' x 0.602'spherical


Swissorama 360 / Imagine 360[59]Ernst A. Heiniger1984Impressions of Switzerland65 mm360°1.91' (outer edge), 1.20' (inner edge)10 perf, 2 sides360° x 35° extreme fisheye70 mm360°360° x 35° extreme fisheye


Super Duper 8 /
Max 8 /
Super 8B[60][61]
Mitch Perkins & Greg Millermid- 1980sSleep Always (2002)8 mm1.510.250' x 0.166'1 perf, 1 sidespherical8 mmno standardno standardspherical


3-perf[62]Rune Ericson1987Pirates of the Lake35 mm1.790.980' x 0.546'3 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mmno standardno standardno standard


Super VistaVision[63]Paramount1989The Ten Commandments (re-release)35 mm1.511.495' x 0.991'8 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical70 mm2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


Kinoton HDFS[64]Kinoton1990no standardno standardno standardno standardno standard35 mm2.000.931' x 0.698'1.5x anamorphic


IMAX Magic Carpet[65]IMAX Corporation1990Flowers in the Sky70 mm x 2 cameras1.342.772' x 2.072'15 perf, 2 sides, horizontallyspherical70 mm, horizontal x 2 projectors1.31 x 2 screens (one in front, one below)2.692' x 2.056'spherical


Iwerksphere[66]Iwerks199165 mm1.372.031' x 1.484'8 perf, 2 sides, 24 or 30 frame/sfisheye70 mm1.341.913' x 1.431'fisheye


IMAX HD[67]IMAX Corporation1992Asteroid Adventure70 mm1.342.772' x 2.072'15 perf, 2 sides, horizontally, 48 frame/sspherical70 mm, horizontal1.312.692' x 2.056'spherical


Hexiplex[68](Australian)1992Expo '92 demo35 mm x 6 cameras1.37 x 6 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm x 6 projectors360°, with rotating screens and projectors0.825' x 0.602'spherical


Ultra Toruscope[56]Mac McCarney199235 mm x 3 cameras1.37 x 3 negatives0.866' x 0.630'4 perf, 2 sides, at 30 frame/sspherical70 mm x 3 projectors, at 30 frame/s360°1.912' x 0.87'spherical


Imagination FX 7012[13]Geo-Odyssey1992?35 mm2.082.040' x 0.980'12 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical70 mm2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


Univisium[69]Vittorio Storaro1998Tango35 mm2.000.945' x 0.472'3 perf, 2 sides at 25 frame/sspherical35 mm2.00spherical


Maxivision[70]Dean Goodhill199935 mm1.790.980' x 0.546'3 perf, 2 sidesspherical35 mm, 3 perf1.85spherical


Maxivision 48[70]Dean Goodhill199935 mm1.790.980' x 0.546'3 perf, 2 sides, 48 frame/sspherical35 mm, 3 perf, 48 frame/s1.85spherical


Super Dimension 70[71]Robert Weisgerber199965 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, at 48 frame/sspherical70 mm, at 48 frame/s2.211.912' x 0.87'spherical


FuturVision 360[49]65 mm1.522.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, 30 frame/s1.5x vertical anamorphic70 mm1.471.912' x 0.87'1.5x vertical anamorphic


Mini-Max[72]Vistascope35 mm2.662 perf, 2 sides, 30 frame/sspherical35 mm2.66spherical


MotionMaster[73]Omni Films65 mm2.282.066' x 0.906'5 perfs, 2 sides, 30 frame/sspherical70 mm2.21, on a curved screen1.912' x 0.87'spherical


Row-film[74]R. Thun35 mm20 rows of images widesphericalspherical


Septorama[49]? mm x 7 cameras1.33 x 7 negativesspherical? mm x 7 projectorshemispherical viewspherical


Single Cinerama[75]Fred Waller35 mmcurved gate16 perf, 2 sides, horizontalspherical35 mm, horizontalcurved screenspherical


Soviet 10[76]65 mm10 perf, 2 sides2x anamorphic70 mm2.091.890' x 1.811'2x anamorphic


Vario-35[76]35 mmspherical35 mmvariable framing run through control signal0.835' x 0.713' (full); 0.835' x 0.453' (1.84); 0.709' x 0.524' (1.35); 0.614' x 0.614' (1.00); 0.535' x 0.713' (0.75)spherical


Vario-35A[76]35 mm35 mmvariable framing run through control signal0.835' x 0.713'variable anamorphic (2x for 2.35; 1.57x for 1.85; 1.17x for 1.37; 0.85x for 1.00; 0.64x for 0.75; 0.5x for 0.59)


Vario-70[76]65 mm10 perfs, 2 sidesspherical70 mmvariable framing run through control signal1.890' x 1.811' (full); 1.890' x 0.803' (2.35); 1.673' x 0.906' (1.85); 1.441' x 1.051' (1.37); 1.232' x 1.232' (1.00); 1.063' x 1.429' (0.74); 0.945' x 1.604' (0.59); 0.839' x 1.811' (0.46)spherical


FormatCreatorEst.First
known work
Negative
gauge
Negative
A/R[1]
Gate
dims
Negative
pulldown
Negative
lenses
Projection
gauge
Projection
A/R[1]
Projection
dims
Projection
lenses

See also[edit]

Notes[edit]

  1. ^ abcdefStrictly speaking, aspect ratios for film are always expressed as the ratio of 1 and are formatted as x:y, e.g. 1.85:1. However, in the interest of formatting, the aspect ratios listed will assume the ratio of 1 and omit the :1 suffix.
  2. ^Burns, R.W., Television: An International History of the Formative Years, p. 71, Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1991.
  3. ^Scott, E. Kilburn, 'The Career of L. A .A. Le Prince', Adventures in Cybersound. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  4. ^Hiller, John. 'Film History for the Public: The First National Movie Machine Collection', Film History, v. 11, n. 3, p. 373. Indiana University Press, 1999.
  5. ^ abSherlock, p. 3.
  6. ^ abcSherlock, p. 40.
  7. ^ abHummel, p. 16.
  8. ^Sherlock, p. 5-6.
  9. ^ abSherlock, p. 4.
  10. ^ abSherlock, p. 5.
  11. ^ abSherlock, p. 6.
  12. ^Sherlock, p. 6-7.
  13. ^ abSherlock, p. 59.
  14. ^ abcHummel, p. 10.
  15. ^Hart, Cinerama Specs.
  16. ^Hart, CinemaScope Specs and Of Apertures and Aspect Ratios.
  17. ^Hart, Ultra Panavision, p. 1.
  18. ^ abHart, VistaVision Specs.
  19. ^Sherlock, p. 27.
  20. ^ abHart, SuperScope Specs.
  21. ^Sherlock, p. 19-20.
  22. ^ abEven after slowing down the frame rate from 30 to 24 frame/s, Todd AO productions retained the use of the same trade name on the 24 frame/s films. There is no difference between 24 frame/s Todd AO, Super Panavision, and what is otherwise referred to as standard 65/70 mm.
  23. ^Hart, Todd A.O. Specs.
  24. ^Hart, CinemaScope Specs.
  25. ^Patrice-Hervé Pont, Jean Loup Princelle: 50 Ans de Caméras Françaises, Le Reve Édition, Ondrevill sur Essone, France, 2007, ISBN2-9522521-3-0, --> page num 107
  26. ^Patrice-Hervé Pont, Jean Loup Princelle: 50 Ans de Caméras Françaises, Le Reve Édition, Ondrevill sur Essone, France, 2007, ISBN2-9522521-3-0, --> page num 51
  27. ^Patrice-Hervé Pont, Jean Loup Princelle: 50 Ans de Caméras Françaises, Le Reve Édition, Ondrevill sur Essone, France, 2007, ISBN2-9522521-3-0, --> page num 59
  28. ^ abcHart, Technirama Specs.
  29. ^Sherlock, p. 58.
  30. ^Hart, Thrillarama
  31. ^Hart, Ultra Panavision Specs.
  32. ^Sherlock, p. 31.
  33. ^Hummel, p. 13.
  34. ^Sherlock, p. 11-12.
  35. ^Hummel, p. 17.
  36. ^Hart, Cinemiracle Specs.
  37. ^Hart, The Smith-Carney System.
  38. ^ abSherlock, p. 19.
  39. ^Fromm, Gerhard. 'The Work of Jan Jacobsen', .in 70 mm: The 70 mm Newsletter, Issue 57 (June 1999). Retrieved 2008-12-01.
  40. ^Nilsen, Sarah Dawn. Projecting America: Films at the Brussels World's Fair of 1958, p. 96. University of Southern California Press, 2000.
  41. ^Hart, Techniscope Specs.
  42. ^ abSherlock, p. 18.
  43. ^Nystrom
  44. ^'Film Gauges'. Preservation Glossary. National Film and Sound Archive. Archived from the original on 2009-02-21.
  45. ^Hart, CinemaScope, p. 6.
  46. ^'Viewpoint Japan', The British Journal of Photography, December 3, 1965, p. 1050.
  47. ^Sherlock, p. 17-18.
  48. ^Clark, Paul. The Chinese Cultural Revolution: A History, p. 146. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  49. ^ abcSherlock, p. 37.
  50. ^Hummel, p. 18.
  51. ^'Pik-A-Movie', British Kinematography Sound and Television, August 1973. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  52. ^Hummel, p. 18-19.
  53. ^Hummel, p. 19.
  54. ^Sherlock, p. 39
  55. ^Giambarba, Paul. The Branding of Polaroid 1957–1977, Chapter 18, 2004-09-01. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  56. ^ abAridi, Sal (July–December 2000). 'Large Format Cinematography'. Operating Cameraman. Archived from the original on 2008-06-29.CS1 maint: Date format (link)
  57. ^Hummel, p. 11.
  58. ^Sherlock, p. 20
  59. ^Piccolin, Lukas. 'All-Around Cinema', in70mm.com, 2004-10-01. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  60. ^Vigeant, Phil. Technical schematic drawings of Max8 format, Pro8mm, 2005-11-09.
  61. ^www.jelve.com. 'Sleep Always lift article'. www.friendlyfirefilms.com.
  62. ^Hummel, p. 20.
  63. ^'Upcoming Re-release of Vertigo', Los Angeles Times, 1996-06-16. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  64. ^Lobban, Grant. 'Widescreen and 3D Formats Wallchart', BKSTS. [year unknown]
  65. ^Schwartzberg, Schlomo. 'IMAX: Oscar nominated Canadian company on the leading edge of technology'Archived 2009-02-15 at the Wayback Machine, Performing Arts and Entertainment in Canada, Spring 1993. Retrieved 2008-07-07.
  66. ^Katz, Stephen Douglas. Film Directing Shot by Shot: Visualizing from Concept to Screen, p. 330. Michael Wiese Productions, 1991.
  67. ^Naimark, 'Giant Rectangular Screens'.
  68. ^Naimark, 'Cylindrical Screens'.
  69. ^Storaro, Vittorio. Storaro's notes on Univision, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  70. ^ abHindes, Andrew. Sticking with 35mm, Variety, 1999-04-19. Retrieved 2008-05-16.
  71. ^Weisgerber, Robert. Super Dimension 70: New 70 mm Process Demonstrated, in70mm.com, Issue 63 (March 2001). Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  72. ^Lobban, Grant. 'Film Gauges and Soundtracks Wallchart', BKSTS. [year unknown]
  73. ^Motion Master[dead link], Screen Digest, October 1, 1995. Retrieved 2008-05-17.
  74. ^Nystrom, sidebar.
  75. ^Kimble, Greg. 'This Is Cinerama!': Cinerama's 50th Anniversary, part 4Archived 2008-04-01 at the Wayback Machine, in70mm.com, 2002-06-10. Retrieved 2008-05-16.
  76. ^ abcdSherlock, p. 58

References[edit]

  • Carr, Robert E. and Hayes, R. M., Wide Screen Movies. A History and Filmography of Wide Gauge Filmmaking. Mc Farland & Company, 1988.
  • Hart, Martin. American Widescreen Museum, 1996–2008. Retrieved on 2008-05-16.
  • Herbert, Stephen and Luke McKernan, eds. Who's Who of Victorian Cinema, 1996–2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Hummel, Rob (editor). American Cinematographer Manual, 8th edition. Hollywood: ASC Press, 2001.
  • Naimark, Michael. Expo '92 Seville, Presence, Vol. 1, No. 3. MIT Press, Summer 1992. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Nystrom, J.E. History of sub-35mm Film Formats and Cameras, 1998–2001. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Sherlock, Daniel J. 'Wide Screen Movies' Corrections, 1994–2004. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.

Further reading[edit]

  • Baumgarten, Martin W. 8 mm Film Gauges, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • de Vries, Tjitte. 'Cinematographe Lumiere' a myth? Who invented the cinema?, 2006. Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Eastman Kodak Corporation. 40 Years of Super 8, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Eastman Kodak Corporation. Kodak Chronology of Motion Picture Films. 2003. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • eFilmCenter. Ultimate Table of Formats and Aspect Ratios, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Fisher, David. Chronomedia, 1970–2006. Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Hart, Douglas C. The Camera Assistant: A Complete Professional Handbook. Newton, Massachusetts: Focal Press, 1996.
  • Hauerslev, Thomas, ed. in70mm.com, 1985–2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Hayes, John. But First, a Brief History of Widescreen..Wide Screen Movies Magazine, Vol. 1, 2002. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Herbert, Stephen. Museum of the Moving Image, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Horak, Jan-Christopher. Introduction to Film Gauges. UCLA Film and Television Archive, 2000. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Internet Movie Database Incorporated. Internet Movie Database, 1990–2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Jennings, Tom (editor). The Dead Media Project, 2001? Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Kattelle, Alan. A Brief History of Amateur Film Gauges and Related Equipment, 1899–2001, 2003. Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Library of Congress, History of Edison Motion Pictures, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • MCC Logical Designs. Technical Info. date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Mendrala, Jim. Aspect Ratio and Image Cutoff, 1994. Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Munafo, Robert P. Film Formats at MROB, 1996–2008. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Musser, Charles. Edison film notes, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • National Media Museum. Collections Department, 2006. Retrieved 2006-12-01.
  • Naughton, Russell. Adventures in Cybersound, 1998–2003. Retrieved on 2006-10-22.
  • Newnham, Grahame. Pathefilm collecting, 2000–2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Norwood, Scott E. Film Tech FAQ, 1998. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Panavision Incorporated. Panavision: Technical Information: Aspect Ratio Overview, 2004. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Roepke, Martina and Henk Verheul. Ernemann film, 2002–2006. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • ScreenSound Australia. Film Formats, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • ScreenSound Australia. Film Gauges, date unknown. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Society of Camera Operators. Operating Cameraman Magazine, 1991–2005. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • UCLA Film and Television Archive. UCLA Film and Television Archive Terminology, Definitions, and Abbreviations List, 2004. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • unknown author. Formats 8 mm, 2004–2005. Retrieved on 2008-06-23.
  • Vigeant, Rhonda. Max 8 Press Release, 2005. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
  • Westphal, Kyle. An Enlarged History of Magnascope, 2016. Retrieved on 2018-01-18
  • Wittmann, Armin Michael. One Long Image. Dissertion for the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 1999. Retrieved on 2006-12-01.
Retrieved from 'https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_motion_picture_film_formats&oldid=898025556'

Download Process Control At Polaroid Pdf 825 Pdf

I put this under digital cameras because there wasn't a place in the forum for digital photo frames.
Wow, you would think that Polaroid, a well respected photo equipment company that's been in business since 1937, would make a digital photo frame that would show your photos without pixelating them! I just got off the phone with their tech support. They said it was my photos that were causing the problem. Funny, another 'off-brand' digital frame I have has absolutely no problem with the exact same pictures. Moral to story..won't be buying anything from Polaroid again. I think technology has left them in the dust. Sad.

Copyright © 2020 d5jxi.netlify.com